In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. - DevDaze

Latest

Devdaze - always share knowledge about - Freelancing | Digital Marketing | SEO | Affiliate Marketing | Fiverr Marketing | Social Media Marketing | Crypto Currency | Web Development | Domain Hosting | Free Software Download | Bd Job News | Tech News | Tips and Tricks | IELTS, etc

Advertisement

الثلاثاء، 28 مارس 2023

In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.



The relationship between equality and personal achievement has been a topic of debate for many years. On one hand, some people believe that an egalitarian society, where everyone has equal opportunities, can lead to higher levels of personal achievement. On the other hand, others argue that personal achievement is only possible in a merit-based system, where individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their abilities.


Proponents of the first viewpoint argue that an egalitarian society promotes fairness and provides equal opportunities for everyone. This creates an environment where people can succeed based on their skills and abilities, rather than their social status or connections. In such a society, individuals are motivated to work hard and strive for success, which can lead to higher levels of personal achievement.


However, opponents of this viewpoint argue that an egalitarian society can actually hinder personal achievement. They believe that people need to be free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits. In a merit-based system, individuals are rewarded for their hard work and talent, while those who do not work hard or lack talent do not succeed. This creates an environment where people are motivated to work hard and strive for success, which can lead to higher levels of personal achievement.


In my opinion, both viewpoints have some validity. While an egalitarian society can provide equal opportunities for everyone, it may not necessarily lead to higher levels of personal achievement. On the other hand, a merit-based system can provide individuals with the motivation to work hard and strive for success, but it can also create a society where those who are less fortunate are left behind.


In conclusion, the relationship between equality and personal achievement is complex, and there is no easy answer. Both an egalitarian society and a merit-based system have their advantages and disadvantages. Ultimately, what is important is to find a balance between the two, where individuals have equal opportunities to succeed, but are also free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits.

ليست هناك تعليقات:

إرسال تعليق